Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dmae.rpl"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(oops) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The DMAEEndian struct is marked as being "straight from the SDK"; thus probably shouldn't be there. [[User:QuarkTheAwesome|Ash]] ([[User talk:QuarkTheAwesome|talk]]) 08:18, 18 August 2016 (CEST) | The DMAEEndian struct is marked as being "straight from the SDK"; thus probably shouldn't be there. [[User:QuarkTheAwesome|Ash]] ([[User talk:QuarkTheAwesome|talk]]) 08:18, 18 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Meh. It's not copyrighted anymore, like it's legal to have it. (And btw, i just used enumeration from the SDK, shouldn't be a problem) | ||
| + | ::And dat "Grammar things" i think i shouldn't get it good xD [[User:NexoCube|NexoCube]] ([[User talk:NexoCube|talk]]) 12:27, 18 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
| + | ::Just because you can obtain it legally, doesn't mean it's not copyrighted and you have permission to freely reproduce it. [[User:Tueidj|Tueidj]] ([[User talk:Tueidj|talk]]) 00:28, 19 August 2016 (CEST) | ||
| + | ::I've taken the liberty of replacing all the SDK material with stuff from Decaf; which seems to be the only other source for this sort of thing. Hopefully people can be confident in the information's legality now. [[User:QuarkTheAwesome|Ash]] ([[User talk:QuarkTheAwesome|talk]]) 02:21, 31 October 2017 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:21, 31 October 2017
The DMAEEndian struct is marked as being "straight from the SDK"; thus probably shouldn't be there. Ash (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2016 (CEST)
- Meh. It's not copyrighted anymore, like it's legal to have it. (And btw, i just used enumeration from the SDK, shouldn't be a problem)
- And dat "Grammar things" i think i shouldn't get it good xD NexoCube (talk) 12:27, 18 August 2016 (CEST)
- Just because you can obtain it legally, doesn't mean it's not copyrighted and you have permission to freely reproduce it. Tueidj (talk) 00:28, 19 August 2016 (CEST)
- I've taken the liberty of replacing all the SDK material with stuff from Decaf; which seems to be the only other source for this sort of thing. Hopefully people can be confident in the information's legality now. Ash (talk) 02:21, 31 October 2017 (CET)