Talk:Cafe OS syscalls: Difference between revisions

From WiiUBrew
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Naehrwert (talk | contribs)
Created page with "How about we replace 'Y' with a mark (e.g. 'x') indicating that the syscall is available and remove 'N' completely? This way the table gets better readable."
 
Missing FastCalls: new section
Line 1: Line 1:
How about we replace 'Y' with a mark (e.g. 'x') indicating that the syscall is available and remove 'N' completely? This way the table gets better readable.
How about we replace 'Y' with a mark (e.g. 'x') indicating that the syscall is available and remove 'N' completely? This way the table gets better readable.
== Missing FastCalls ==
Since the SysCall_Handler masks with rlwimi r12,r0,5,{22,26} - shouldn't the last FastCall be #0x1F ?
0x3E0/0x20=0x1F, so base 0xFFF021A0 + 0x3E0 =0xFFF02580, the APP_Panic that loads r3 with 0x3001F.
I know 0x1A, 0x1B,0x1C, 0x1D, 0x1E and 0x1F all branch to the table_dispatcher with AppPanic loaded, but later we could use these for other things...

Revision as of 07:11, 19 April 2016

How about we replace 'Y' with a mark (e.g. 'x') indicating that the syscall is available and remove 'N' completely? This way the table gets better readable.

Missing FastCalls

Since the SysCall_Handler masks with rlwimi r12,r0,5,{22,26} - shouldn't the last FastCall be #0x1F ? 0x3E0/0x20=0x1F, so base 0xFFF021A0 + 0x3E0 =0xFFF02580, the APP_Panic that loads r3 with 0x3001F.

I know 0x1A, 0x1B,0x1C, 0x1D, 0x1E and 0x1F all branch to the table_dispatcher with AppPanic loaded, but later we could use these for other things...