Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internet Browser"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should stick to the JavaScript API scheme of fields, methods and events for every object (as the official page does). --[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] ([[User talk:Elisherer|talk]]) 19:16, 4 December 2012 (CET) | I think we should stick to the JavaScript API scheme of fields, methods and events for every object (as the official page does). --[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] ([[User talk:Elisherer|talk]]) 19:16, 4 December 2012 (CET) | ||
: I mildly disagree. I like having it broken into sections as it makes it easier to navigate and helps avoid feeling like you're trying to cram too much information into a table cell. [[User:Ahigerd|Ahigerd]] ([[User talk:Ahigerd|talk]]) 19:21, 5 December 2012 (CET) | : I mildly disagree. I like having it broken into sections as it makes it easier to navigate and helps avoid feeling like you're trying to cram too much information into a table cell. [[User:Ahigerd|Ahigerd]] ([[User talk:Ahigerd|talk]]) 19:21, 5 December 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | :: I can see the advantages of this method. --[[User:Elisherer|Elisherer]] ([[User talk:Elisherer|talk]]) 20:25, 5 December 2012 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 5 December 2012
I think we should stick to the JavaScript API scheme of fields, methods and events for every object (as the official page does). --Elisherer (talk) 19:16, 4 December 2012 (CET)